Web26 jun. 2024 · Metalclad Corp. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/97/l, Award, 30 August. Mexico v. Metalclad Corp ., Supreme Court of British Columbia 2001 BCSC 664 (Judgment of 2 May 2001). WebMetalclad, a U.S. corporation operating through its Mexican subsidiary (investment), received from the Mexican federal government the permit to construct a hazardous …
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID ...
WebThe United Mexican States v. Metalclad Corp., 2001 B.C.S.C. 665 at 31 (May 2, 2001). 8 NAFTA, supra note 3, art. 1110, at 641. 9 Id. art. 201, at 298. 10 An investor-state dispute is a binding arbitration proceeding brought by a business investor against a … Web12 apr. 2024 · 6. Metalclad Corporation v. United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1) – In this case, Metalclad challenged the denial of a permit to operate a hazardous waste landfill in Mexico. The tribunal held that Mexico had breached its obligations under the NAFTA. 7. Saluka Investments BV v. order flowers online athens
Tecmed v. Mexico – Investment Treaty News
WebMetalclad Corporation v. The United Mexican States (ICSID Case No. ARB(AB)/97/1) Submission of the Government of the United States of America 1. Pursuant to NAFTA … Web5 aug. 2001 · Respondent, Metalclad Corporation ("Metalclad"), an American corporation established under the laws of the State of Delaware. Mexico seeks to set aside the … WebThis dispute arises out of the activities of the Claimant, Metalclad Corporation (hereinafter “Metalclad”), in the Mexican Municipality of Guadalcazar (hereinafter “Guadalcazar”), located in the Mexican State of San Luis Potosi (hereinafter “SLP”). Metalclad alleges that Respondent, the United Mexican States (hereinafter “Mexico”), through its local … ird inc code